Opponents of the research gas and shale oils usually refer to the documentary

Opponents of the research gas and shale oils usually refer to the documentary "GasLand" Mr. Josh Fox, distributed by the American channel HBO, well done, but unfortunately full of cons-truths below the translation of a critical analysis of this documentary, beverage technology the original in English is at the following address: http://www.energyindepth.org/2010/06/debunking-gasland/. This text shows that the oil profession has excellent arguments against Mr. Fox.
GasLand debunked June 9, 2010 Josh Fox made his debut to the general public beverage technology with his documentary on the exploitation of natural gas. But how this documentary is it true? Josh Fox is a director and director avant-garde whose previous films have been awarded the "Fringe beverage technology Festival" or "off" in New York. For him, the national distribution beverage technology planned for the end of the month the documentary GasLand by the American channel HBO, is a first breakthrough to the general public beverage technology its first opportunity to touch even a small part of the potential audience this chain which has some 30 million subscribers. But access to a wider audience, accompanied by a scientist hype creates new expectations: accuracy, attention to detail and originality of the story. beverage technology Unfortunately, in the case of this film, accuracy is too often neglected in favor of reducing simplifications, the facts sacrificed for exaggeration, while the characters and stories, have a taste of warmed since already existed in his documentaries Previous themselves demystified. "I'm sorry, said Josh Fox in New York City magazine, but the art is more important than politics. beverage technology [...] In politics, people will lie and simplify everything, whereas art deals with contradictions. "GasLand, unfortunately, this is all in one: the policy is violated, the art gives way to dummy effects, in a work that no longer standing there as factual contradictions weigh heavy. It is this context which imposes a rethinking of some of the most glaring errors relied upon this film. Unless otherwise indicated, all quotations are from Josh Fox. Divert the mind of the law (6:05) "What I did not know is that the proposed energy bill that Dick Cheney beverage technology was to force Congress in 2005 exempted and gas companies oil to meet the Clean Water Act [Act on the Protection of water], the Clean Air Act [Air Protection], the Safe Drinking Water Act [Act Safe Drinking Water] Act Superfund [protection against beverage technology hazardous waste], and a dozen other laws relating to the environment, promulgated by the Democratic Administration. " This statement is false from one end to the other. The oil and gas industry are subject to each of these laws, since they are likely to apply to their operations. See this newsletter for a more detailed explanation. The hydraulic beverage technology fracturing process which seems to refer Fox never in sixty years of existence, been subject to the law on the safety of drinking water (SDWA). However, it was controlled so competent and severe states that were able to compile an impressive beverage technology number of reports of implementation and follow-up over the decades. Far from being "passed in force" by Dick Cheney, the Energy Policy Act of 2005 had the support of nearly three-quarters of U.S. senators (74 votes "for"), beverage technology including the Democratic head Committee on Energy, the current Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar, then a senator beverage technology from Colorado, or a former junior senator from Illinois named Barack Obama. Side of the House of Representatives, 75 Democrats joined 200 Republicans to support the final draft, including the Democrats beverage technology at the head of the Committee on Energy and Commerce and the Natural Resources.
(6:24) "But when in 2005 the law on industrial energy freed of all these restrictions, [...] they have started to use technology and Halliburton have launched operating the largest campaign domestic gas the country's history, conducted today in thirty four states. " beverage technology Again, hydraulic fracturing has never been subject to the Act respecting the safety of drinking water, either during the sixty years of existence of this technology, the thirty-six years of existence law, or forty years of existence of the Agency for the Protection of the Environment. Therefore, it is not clear what "restrictions" could be canceled by the law of 2005 by Fox. This law sought only to clarify beverage technology the existing Congressional intent regarding the scope of the Act respecting the safety of drinking water. The idea