But even without complying with the above requirements to which the amendments adopted tax and cont

... I'm not an economist, but I think that the state budget should consider not only economists. And perhaps it unwisely tools and equipment in food preservation as an expression of immodesty, when I say that you even think also that it can be an important enrichment purely economic reasoning.
I do not envy the submitter of the budget and does not deny that the challenges faced and are facing is not small. Nor do I think that anything that brings this draft budget - particularly in the area of restrictions - is wrong. And no I'm not saying that all the problems that Finance Minister faces come at the expense of the government. However, I can not not recall Rózsafa tools and equipment in food preservation economic policy from the time of the first Minister Robert Fico, the consequences of which are backfire his second government. It was mainly the years 2006 - 2010 when the government taught us that life on debt is a "right choice" and when podchvíľou emerged a long time remained unnoticed new government and a new tacking and emission Reports, giving the green light to financial fraud and tunneling public funds. The amount by which Slovakia had in these matters dealt with, the plus-minus precisely quantifiable and more or less known are the ones who are causing them. Unknown and incomprehensible just why are those disposed of funds in the budget has not returned and why we pretend like we even bother.
So much, so to speak, to the historical - although still relevant today - background. Now the proposals under discussion. This draft budget is problematic as regards its form and substance, so to speak.
To the form that one would raise a number of objections: from how was discussed in committee after it, as it sought to fundamentally change retrospectively Amendments, which, to put it mildly, substandard. But more on that in some detail and convincingly speak my previous speaker and predrečníčky, and it does not matter that I repeated tools and equipment in food preservation it, too.
First of all, the very philosophy of budgeting and its consistency, respectively. non-compliance tools and equipment in food preservation with the government regulation. Between these two fundamental materials see a significant discrepancy. This contradiction can be found in many places, but I will address only the fact that the draft budget fails to take account of the Government declared commitments tools and equipment in food preservation for the transition to a green economy and sustainable development trajectory.
The main reason why this is so, I see in refusing to even proceed with caution to ecological tax reform. As we discussed here several times, the main purpose of ecological tax reform is logically higher load "things" that we have the least (excessive pumping of raw materials, waste of scarce resources, land degradation, pollution and so on.), On the other hand, the lowest load of which we have the most, and it is especially employment opportunities, jobs, just work. This reform tools and equipment in food preservation is budget neutral in the sense that what we get on the one hand, the other can be broken tools and equipment in food preservation in favor of desired needs.
But even without complying with the above requirements to which the amendments adopted tax and contribution rules direction last year came close, but rather withdrew from them, could have been at least partially keep the promises of the government program. It was enough, for example, consistently used the expected resources from the sale of emission allowances to truly green projects, accept our requests to the greening tools and equipment in food preservation of public procurement processes, and make the investment incentives and their environmental benefits.
There were already several times mentioned quantum partial risk budget. I main problem, or you risk to see that sufficient system does not address the growing public debt, preferred ad hoc solutions and operates a systematic and long-term solutions, helps conserve outdated development model of the industrial era, does not constitute a sustainable direction of the economy, supported small and medium enterprises domestic origin. As well as how it is systemically tax and levies and general economic policy of the state - as the government during this set - upstream against prospective and long-term sustainable trend. And despite numerous restrictions, which are not always tools and equipment in food preservation directed in the right direction and touch often vital and important areas, while on the other hand, do not affect example problematic grants, guarantees and the like. in activities that will ultimately bring more harm than good. How bead mention tools and equipment in food preservation five hundred thousand euros to promoting perverse aspect of Olympic events in the national parks.
Green projects, promotion of green, not gray, that is concrete, infrastructure is almost perfect example of the application of such a win-win strategy, because they are actually beneficial simultaneously in several spheres and then bring synergies.
From an economic point of view, development momentum, which the Prime Minister so fond of saying. Just before he is considering development impulses along the lines of the 20th century and Slovakia as a third world country, green projects are the topic of the 21st century, the era postindustrializmu and size categories with us comparable countries such as. Finland