Jump to Blog choose ... Science Blogs Home Everything that lives Astrodicticum simplex blooDNAcid C

Jump to Blog choose ... Science Blogs Home Everything that lives Astrodicticum simplex blooDNAcid Chevoja Deutsches Museum Epi goes Gender ErklärFix evolvimus flight and time Fresh Wind Geograffitico Health Check Here live dragons Rock from the Sun Klausis crypto column intended Critical agarbatti making Mathlog sea text naklar Open Skies panoramic placebo agarbatti making alarm PrimaKlima Science Blogs Podcast agarbatti making - Science takeaway Science meets Society SocioKommunikativ From bits and bytes weatherlog WeiterGen Science Communication Science feuilleton political animal [sic] - Science Communication 3vor10 Everything that flies American encounters the other hand And the water Seems inviting Arte-facts beauty full Science Chemically, Columbus Guest Blog Evolver The laboratory diary DiAx's Rake The other formation seen through E-Mobility sounder A bit dark For Women in Science Geo? Logically! Historians Iconic Turn guest blog your research question communication of the future complete complex Critical Mass Backstage-en-blog praise of the disease meal Medlog wit Nano youth neuron neuroscience education Nobel Faces Nobel Laureate agarbatti making Meeting persona agarbatti making grata school makes future Science Picture electricity critters Deep Life TwOpinion VDE MedTech Science and reunification number of images divers Future Technologies In National Geographic Search
The post was published nachfolgene explains in its original form as a comment agarbatti making to the entry placebo. At my suggestion, the author Florian Albrecht, a practicing physician in Switzerland, once again it here - set as Guest Post - in a revised agarbatti making and supplemented form. Confusion about BÄK opinion: Shall replace placebos effective drugs? by Florian Albrecht
In recent days there had been on different blogs a few irritations agarbatti making due to a study published last summer opinion of the German Medical Association (GMA) on "placebo in medicine". In the episode in some media had been expressed, the BÄK urge the increased use of placebos to reduce healthcare costs. This impression was i.Br., reinforced also by an article by Prof. Dr. Giovanni Maio, medical ethicist at the University of Freiburg, but in my opinion also passes a little to the core statement of GMA-opinion.
For it is in this paper only once not about to suddenly replace effective drug therapies by placebo treatments. But rather at all better to explore the placebo effect only once. Only then can be thought at all about the future to increase it and use a much more targeted in medicine in particular. In addition, one would also very much about the mode of action is already in use medical drugs (verum) learn as well as in their application agarbatti making presumably should be in the game, a certain placebo effect with.
Play a very special role in the so-called "pseudo-placebo". These are drugs that do have a demonstrable effect in the human body, but in which the actual observed effects even go beyond the disease of the patient. If this bogus placebos can be replaced without major problems by "real" placebo, a lot of money could be saved in health care.
Since the experimental placebo research shows can draw what benefits the patient from a placebo (eg, reduction of side effects), thus keeping the majority of the members of the working group from an ethical perspective, agarbatti making the conscious application of pure placebo agarbatti making or so-called "pseudo-placebo" in therapeutic practice (outside of clinical trials) perfectly tenable, and under the following conditions and in accordance with the prevailing Rechtsaufassung: agarbatti making There is no proven effective (pharmaco) therapy available. There is relatively little discomfort and it is the express wish of the patient after treatment before agarbatti making there is any prospect of success agarbatti making a Placebobehandlung.bei this disease
Thus, one could this topic so only once to check off. If not all of the opinion would have been misunderstood once thoroughly both in the general press, as well as in medical circles. And here on the science blogs was no different. As in the last 3 days were a few fundamental agarbatti making debates on the question whether the use of placebos in medicine is ever ethically justifiable on.
I have to admit: I have first-hand a while before I understood the BÄK opinion correctly. And I let myself irritated by the media response to it. Therefore, I have also written a comment on Jürgens blog, which deals with the problem of placebo use in general.
Zuers